Everyone knows Bernard Tschumi, former dean of Columbia’s architecture school; designer of the Derrida-inflected Parc de la Villette, sited in an old Parisian abattoir; red scarf-wearer. They might not know that, years ago, the only time Bernard would spend with his father, Jean, was on Tschumi Sr.’s weekly Sunday site visits to buildings his firm had under construction. “For me architecture was something very banal as a result,” Bernard says. “I had that intimate knowledge of the work, but I was never been trying to look forward with it.”
It wasn’t until he came to school in the United States at seventeen and discovered American cities like New York and Chicago that the younger Tschumi decided he actually wanted to follow in his father’s footsteps. A year later, Jean Tschumi died, suddenly, and on Bernard’s 18th birthday: “I regret that I never really talked about architecture with my father.”
A new monograph, Jean Tschumi: Architecture at Full Scale, can be read as the younger Tschumi’s way of connecting with his history, both architectural and personal. “I’m a different type of architect,” Bernard says of looking through his father’s archives, collected and discussed by Jacques Gubler and published by Skira, a house Jean had liked. “But at the same time, the things that he could do, and that they could do at that time – I’m tremendously jealous.” Part of the shift has to do with the tides of architectural history, in the current focus, at least in the UK, on a tension between postmodernism and neoclassicism, and part of it, Bernard argues, with the loss of craftsmen, of focus on detailing and interiors.
Architecture at Full Scale is a rigorously and thoroughly historical book, full of drawings and sketches and photographs of Tschumi’s works, and it proves an evocative reminder of the brute power of useful and usable design. One particularly memorable plate, a gouache painting of a proposal for Nestle’s corporate headquarters, looks like something out of Fritz Lang’s Metropolis by way of Liz Diller (she also used gouache as a student), while sketches for the pharmaceutical giant Sandoz hint at the force that can be so unsubtly entrenched within an architecture of control (think Brazil.)
It is also a remarkably sweet book, operating simultaneously as homage to an influential architect, and as thanks to a father for those weekly afternoon strolls.