To coincide with the debut of Departures and Virtual World, Langlands & Bell’s two new digital art projects created especially for, we decided to politely interrogate the artistic duo – now in their thirtieth fruitful year of collaboration – and find out what makes them tick.

The theme of international connectedness arises often in your art, and you chose an airport aesthetic for the Wallpaper* showcase. Can you explain your conceptual motivation?

The world is an increasingly connected place. New technologies and information are collapsing time and distance all the time. You only have to look at Wallpaper*, who reads it, and all the places it is available around the world to see that.

Take us through the timeline for the creation of your newest work, Virtual World. How long did the project take?

Our work takes as long as it needs. We can never predict or remember how long pieces take to make. If we could we probably wouldn’t make any more!

In Virtual World your stated aim is to 'make sense of the digital world'. What about the digital world, per se, do you find confusing / compelling / interesting? Is the increasing 'digitisation' of our world a good thing?

Yes, we find it exciting / demanding / enabling / time consuming / beguiling. As systems multiply we have an increasing need for abbreviated means to identify elements and events.

What does beauty mean to you? To what extent do you try to create beautiful art?

Beauty is compelling and absorbing, and for us it is a way into our work.

You embraced digital media early on. The boundaries of what constitutes 'art' are constantly expanding. In which direction do you think they’re heading? What's keeping you interested?

Beauty, ideas, and tomorrow’s unpredictability keep us interested.

You've created full-scale bridges, furniture, digital art, even carpet. What are you working on now?

We are currently making a film for the Folkestone Triennial opening in June, and also preparing an exhibition opening in October at Talbot Rice Gallery, Edinburgh presenting a selection from 30 years of our film and animation works.

If you had an unlimited budget for a single project, what would you do?

We would flatten all the ugly, unsustainable, rabbit hutch housing spreading everywhere like a rash, rehouse everyone temporarily at Claridge’s, and build beautiful, sustainable, homes.

Which projects, if any, do you look back on and cringe? From which have you learned the most?

The answer to both parts of the question is the Turner Prize, when a large part of our work was removed from the exhibition at Tate two days before it opened to the public.

What reaction / compliment would you most like to receive from a spectator of your art?

A smile.

Who, in your opinion, is the single most interesting figure in art right now? In architecture?

There is no single most interesting figure in art or architecture right now. There are lots of interesting people. That is why both art and architecture are so interesting.

The boundaries between various forms of creative expression – art, architecture and fashion, in particular – are increasingly indistinct. Is this a good thing?

It’s a good thing if it means there is a free exchange of ideas and artificial boundaries and false hierarchies are diminished.

Are art and architecture inextricably linked? Do you think they’re becoming indistinguishable?

Obviously art and architecture are inextricably linked. They are not the same thing, but sometimes something can be both art and architecture simultaneously. We can see art and architecture as ideas and relationships in material form. Art strives to be independent, that is its purpose or it is not art. Architecture strives to be purposeful, or it is not architecture.